| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
total
|
| Focus
and Organization |
Project
shows no focus and is very hard to follow. No attempt to transition
with other presentation. |
Project
remains on topic, but does not flow within the topic. Organization
is loose and there are gaps in the sequence or content. Transition
between presentation is labored. |
Project
is well focused, but there are some organizational flaws. Transition
between presentations is effective. |
Project
demonstrates strong, consistent focus and is organized to maximize
the benefit to the audience. Transition between presentations is
seamless. |
|
| Subject
Knowledge |
Student
does not have a grasp of the information they are presenting; student
cannot answer questions about the subject. |
Student
is uncomfortable with the material and is only able to discuss material
at a rudimentary level. |
Student
is at ease with material. They can answer questions but are not
able to elaborate on their answers. |
Student
demonstrates full knowledge and ease of recall and discussion of
their topic. |
|
| Technology
in presentation |
Technology
used not appropriate to the presentation |
Limited
use of technology. |
Good,
consistent use of technology. |
Technology
used in appropriate, interactive ways throughout the presentation
to enhance the experience and learning of the audience. |
|
| Mechanics
(written) |
Student
written work has four or more spelling and/or grammatical errors |
Written
work has three spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Written
work has one or two spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Written
presentation has no spelling or grammatical errors. |
|
| Eye
Contact and Poise |
Student
has no eye contact and reads the majority of the report. |
Student
occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads their report. |
Student
has good eye contact with a few people, but uses notes as a crutch.
|
Student
has excellent eye contact with all members of the class and seldom
refers to notes. |
|
| Elocution |
Student
mumbles and pronounces terms incorrectly. Speaking is too low for
all audience members to hear. |
Student's
voice is low but clear. Voice may be monotone. Words are still pronounced
incorrectly. Speaking is still too low to be heard in the back.
|
Student's
voice is clear and words are pronounced correctly. Most audience
members can hear. |
Student
uses a dynamic, engaging voice with appropriate pronunciation. All
members of the audience can hear. |
|
| Interactive
Component |
A
limited interactive component of inappropriate length is included.
|
An
interactive component that is the correct length, but does not increase
understanding or apply knowledge is used. |
Some
students are engaged by the interactive component but it has limited
ability to increase understanding or apply knowledge. |
The
interactive component is appropriate, engaging, and greatly enhances
student understanding. |
|
| Web
Page Summary |
Web
summary is merely a placeholder. |
Summary
is an incomplete reflection of the overall presentation |
Summary
is a complete and accurate reflection of the presentation |
Web
page summary is an excellent companion piece to the presentation.
It uses information from the presentation and extends it further.
|
|
| Bibliography |
Limited
Bibliography |
Bibliography
unclear and sources are questionable |
Bibliography
clear with consistent format. Some sources are questionable |
Bibliography
is clear, with sources that are reputable and links are provided
for all online resources. Due day of presentations. |
|